Paper detail

Constrained-degree percolation on the hypercubic lattice: uniqueness and some of its consequences

We consider the constrained-degree percolation (CDP) model on the hypercubic lattice. This is a continuous-time percolation model defined by a sequence $(U_e)_{e\in\mathcal{E}^d}$ of i.i.d. uniform random variables and a positive integer $k$, referred to as the constraint. The model evolves as follows: each edge $e$ attempts to open at a random time $U_e$, independently of all other edges. It succeeds if, at time $U_e$, both of its end-vertices have degrees strictly smaller than $k$. It is known \cite{hartarsky2022weakly} that this model undergoes a phase transition when $d\geq3$ for most nontrivial values of $k$. In this work, we prove that, for any fixed constraint, the number of infinite clusters at any time $t\in[0,1)$ is almost surely either 0 or 1. This uniqueness result implies the continuity of the percolation function in the supercritical regime, $t\in(t_c,1)$, where $t_c$ denotes the percolation critical threshold. The proof relies on a key time-regularity property of the model: the law of the process is continuous with respect to time for local events. In fact, we establish differentiability in time, thereby extending the result of \cite{SSS} to the CDP setting.

preprint2025arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.