Paper detail

Constantin Carathéodory axiomatic approach and Grigory Perelman thermodynamics for geometric flows and cosmological solitonic solutions

We elaborate on statistical thermodynamics models of relativistic geometric flows as generalisations of G. Perelman and R. Hamilton theory centred around C. Carathéodory axiomatic approach to thermodynamics with Pfaffian differential equations. The anholonomic frame deformation method, AFDM, for constructing generic off--diagonal and locally anisotropic cosmological solitonic solutions in the theory of relativistic geometric flows and general relativity is developed. We conclude that such solutions can not be described in terms of the Hawking--Bekenstein thermodynamics for hypersurface, holographic, (anti) de Sitter and similar configurations. The geometric thermodynamic values are defined and computed for nonholonomic Ricci flows, (modified) Einstein equations, and new classes of locally anisotropic cosmological solutions encoding solitonic hierarchies.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.