Paper detail

Constant TMR magnetic field sensor detectivity with bias voltage

In this letter, we present a study of optimized TMR magnetic field sensors as a function of voltage bias. The 1/f low-frequency noise is quantified by the Hooge-like parameter α which allows to compare the low-frequency behavior of various TMR sensors. The sensitivity as well as the detectivity of the sensor are characterized in the parallel state and at 0 mT. We observe that the sensitivity shows a strong voltage dependence and the noise presents an unexpected decrease, not anticipated by the Hooge's law. Moreover, surprisingly, an almost stable detectivity (140-200 nT/sqrt(Hz) at 10 Hz and 15-20 nT/sqrt(Hz) at 1 kHz) as a function of the bias voltage is observed, tending to highlight that the variation of sensitivity and noise are correlated. Even if the I-V curves are strongly non-linear and reflect the different symmetries of the conduction bands channels, the variations in sensitivity and noise seems to depend mainly on the distortion of the MgO barrier due to bias voltage. With a simple model where the normal noise and sensitivity of the TMR sensors are modified by an element having no noise and a parabolic conductance with voltage, we describe the behavior of noise and sensitivity from mV to V.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.