Paper detail

Constant-time one-shot testing of large-scale graph states

Fault-tolerant measurement-based quantum computation (MBQC) with recent progress on quantum technologies leads to a promising scalable platform for realizing quantum computation, conducted by preparing a large-scale graph state over many qubits and performing single-qubit measurements on the state. With fault-tolerant MBQC, even if the graph-state preparation suffers from errors occurring at an unknown physical error rate, we can suppress the effect of the errors. Verifying graph states is vital to test whether we can conduct MBQC as desired even with such errors. However, problematically, existing state-of-the-art protocols for graph-state verification by fidelity estimation have required measurements on many copies of the entire graph state and hence have been prohibitively costly in terms of the number of qubits and the runtime. We here construct an efficient alternative framework for testing graph states for fault-tolerant MBQC based on the theory of property testing. Our test protocol accepts with high probability when the physical error rate is small enough to make fault-tolerant MBQC feasible and rejects when the rate is above the threshold of fault-tolerant MBQC. The novelty of our protocol is that we use only a single copy of the $N$-qubit graph state and single-qubit Pauli measurements only on a constant-sized subset of the qubits; thus, the protocol has a constant runtime independently of $N$. Furthermore, we can immediately use the rest of the graph state for fault-tolerant MBQC if the protocol accepts. These results achieve a significant advantage over prior art for graph-state verification in the number of qubits and the total runtime. Consequently, our work offers a new route to a fast and practical framework for benchmarking large-scale quantum state preparation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.