Paper detail

Constant factor Approximation Algorithms for Uniform Hard Capacitated Facility Location Problems: Natural LP is not too bad

In this paper, we give first constant factor approximation for capacitated knapsack median problem (CKM) for hard uniform capacities, violating the budget only by an additive factor of $f_{max}$ where $f_{max}$ is the maximum cost of a facility opened by the optimal and violating capacities by $(2+ε)$ factor. Natural LP for the problem is known to have an unbounded integrality gap when any one of the two constraints is allowed to be violated by a factor less than $2$. Thus, we present a result which is very close to the best achievable from the natural LP. To the best of our knowledge, the problem has not been studied earlier. For capacitated facility location problem with uniform capacities, a constant factor approximation algorithm is presented violating the capacities a little ($1 + ε$). Though constant factor results are known for the problem without violating the capacities, the result is interesting as it is obtained by rounding the solution to the natural LP, which is known to have an unbounded integrality gap without violating the capacities. Thus, we achieve the best possible from the natural LP for the problem. The result shows that natural LP is not too bad. Finally, we raise some issues with the proofs of the results presented in \cite{capkmByrkaFRS2013} for capacitated $k$-facility location problem (C$k$FLP). \cite{capkmByrkaFRS2013} presents $O(1/ε^2)$ approximation violating the capacities by a factor of $(2 + ε)$ using dependent rounding. We first fix these issues using our techniques. Also, it can be argued that (deterministic) pipage rounding cannot be used to open the facilities instead of dependent rounding. Our techniques for CKM provide a constant factor approximation for CkFLP violating the capacities by $(2 + ε)$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.