Paper detail

Consistent coarse-graining strategy for polymer solutions in the thermal crossover from Good to Theta solvent

We extend our previously developed coarse-graining strategy for linear polymers with a tunable number n of effective atoms (blobs) per chain [D&#39;Adamo et al., J. Chem. Phys. 137, 4901 (2012)] to polymer systems in thermal crossover between the good-solvent and the Theta regimes. We consider the thermal crossover in the region in which tricritical effects can be neglected, i.e. not too close to the Theta point, for a wide range of chain volume fractions Phi=c/c* (c* is the overlap concentration), up to Phi=30. Scaling crossover functions for global properties of the solution are obtained by Monte-Carlo simulations of the Domb-Joyce model. They provide the input data to develop a minimal coarse-grained model with four blobs per chain. As in the good-solvent case, the coarse-grained model potentials are derived at zero density, thus avoiding the inconsistencies related to the use of state-dependent potentials. We find that the coarse-grained model reproduces the properties of the underlying system up to some reduced density which increases when lowering the temperature towards the Theta state. Close to the lower-temperature crossover boundary, the tetramer model is accurate at least up to Phi<10, while near the good-solvent regime reasonably accurate results are obtained up to Phi<2. The density region in which the coarse-grained model is predictive can be enlarged by developing coarse-grained models with more blobs per chain. We extend the strategy used in the good-solvent case to the crossover regime. This requires a proper treatment of the length rescalings as before, but also a proper temperature redefinition as the number of blobs is increased. The case n=10 is investigated. Comparison with full-monomer results shows that the density region in which accurate predictions can be obtained is significantly wider than that corresponding to the n=4 case.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.