Paper detail

Consistency of the Plug-In Estimator of the Entropy Rate for Ergodic Processes

A plug-in estimator of entropy is the entropy of the distribution where probabilities of symbols or blocks have been replaced with their relative frequencies in the sample. Consistency and asymptotic unbiasedness of the plug-in estimator can be easily demonstrated in the IID case. In this paper, we ask whether the plug-in estimator can be used for consistent estimation of the entropy rate $h$ of a stationary ergodic process. The answer is positive if, to estimate block entropy of order $k$, we use a sample longer than $2^{k(h+ε)}$, whereas it is negative if we use a sample shorter than $2^{k(h-ε)}$. In particular, if we do not know the entropy rate $h$, it is sufficient to use a sample of length $(|X|+ε)^{k}$ where $|X|$ is the alphabet size. The result is derived using $k$-block coding. As a by-product of our technique, we also show that the block entropy of a stationary process is bounded above by a nonlinear function of the average block entropy of its ergodic components. This inequality can be used for an alternative proof of the known fact that the entropy rate a stationary process equals the average entropy rate of its ergodic components.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.