Paper detail

Consistency between black hole and mimetic gravity -- Case of $(2+1)$-dimensional gravity

We show that the mimetic theory with the constraint $g^{ρσ}\partial_ρϕ\partial_σϕ=1$ cannot realize the black hole geometry with the horizon(s). To overcome such issue, we may change the mimetic constraint a little bit by $ω(ϕ) g^{ρσ}\partial_ρϕ\partial_σϕ=-1,$ where $ω(ϕ)$ is a function of the scalar field $ϕ$. As an example, we consider $(2+1)$-dimensional mimetic gravity with the mimetic potential and construct black hole (BH) solutions by using this modified constraint. We study three different classes: In the first class, we assume the Lagrange multiplier and mimetic potential are vanishing and obtain a BH solution that fully matches the BH of GR despite the non-triviality of the mimetic field which ensures the study presented in {\it JCAP 01 (2019) 058}. In the second class, we obtain a BH having constant mimetic potential and a non-trivial form of the Lagrange multiplier. In the third class, we obtain a new BH solution with non-vanishing values of the mimetic field, the Lagrange multiplier, and the mimetic potential. In any case, the solutions correspond to the space-time with only one horizon but we show that the formalism for the constraint works.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.