Paper detail

Considerations in optimizing CMB polarization experiments to constrain inflationary physics

We quantify the limiting factors in optimizing current-technology cosmic microwave background (CMB) polarization experiments in order to learn about inflationary physics. We consider space-based, balloon-borne and ground-based experiments. We find that foreground contamination and residuals from foreground subtraction are ultimately the limiting factors in detecting a primordial gravity wave signal. For full-sky space-based experiments, these factors hinder the detection of tensor-to-scalar ratios of r < 10^{-3} on large scales, while for ground-based experiments these factors impede the ability to apply delensing techniques. We consider ground-based/balloon-borne experiments of currently planned or proposed designs and find that it is possible for a value of r=0.01 to be measured at ~ 3-sigma level. A small space-based CMB polarization experiment, with current detector technology and full sky coverage, can detect r ~ 10^{-3} at the ~ 3-sigma level, but a markedly improved knowledge of polarized foregrounds is needed. We advocate using as wide a frequency coverage as possible in order to carry out foreground subtraction at the percent level, which is necessary to measure such a small primordial tensor amplitude. To produce a clearly detectable (>3-sigma) tensor component in a realistic CMB experiment, inflation must either involve large-field variations, Δϕ>~ 1 or multi-field/hybrid models. Hybrid models can be easily distinguished from large-field models due to their blue scalar spectral index. Therefore, an observation of a tensor/scalar ratio and n < 1 in future experiments with the characteristics considered here may be an indication that inflation is being driven by some physics in which the inflaton cannot be described as a fundamental field.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.