Paper detail

Consensus for Clusters of Agents with Cooperative and Antagonistic Relationships

In this paper we address the consensus problem in the context of networked agents whose communication graph can be split into a certain number of clusters in such a way that interactions between agents in the same clusters are cooperative, while interactions between agents belonging to different clusters are antagonistic. This problem set-up arises in the context of social networks and opinion dynamics, where reaching consensus means that the opinions of the agents in the same cluster converge to the same decision. The consensus problem is here investigated under the assumption that agents in the same cluster have the same constant and pre-fixed amount of trust (/distrust) to be distributed among their cooperators (/adversaries). The proposed solution establishes how much agents in the same group must be conservative about their opinions in order to converge to a common decision.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.