Paper detail

Consensus-Based Dantzig-Wolfe Decomposition

Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition (DWD) is a classical algorithm for solving large-scale linear programs whose constraint matrix involves a set of independent blocks coupled with a set of linking rows. The algorithm decomposes such a model into a master problem and a set of independent subproblems that can be solved in a distributed manner. In a typical implementation, the master problem is solved centrally. In certain settings, solving the master problem centrally is undesirable or infeasible, such as in the case of decentralized storage of data, or when independent agents who are responsible for the subproblems desire privacy of information. In this paper, we propose a fully distributed DWD algorithm which relies on solving the master problem using a consensus-based Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) method. We derive error bounds on the optimality gap and feasibility violation of the proposed approach. We provide preliminary computational results for our algorithm using a Message Passing Interface (MPI) implementation on cutting stock instances from the literature and synthetic instances where we obtain high quality solutions.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.