Paper detail

Consecutive Ones Property and PQ-Trees for Multisets: Hardness of Counting Their Orderings

A binary matrix satisfies the consecutive ones property (COP) if its columns can be permuted such that the ones in each row of the resulting matrix are consecutive. Equivalently, a family of sets F = {Q_1,..,Q_m}, where Q_i is subset of R for some universe R, satisfies the COP if the symbols in R can be permuted such that the elements of each set Q_i occur consecutively, as a contiguous segment of the permutation of R's symbols. We consider the COP version on multisets and prove that counting its solutions is difficult (#P-complete). We prove completeness results also for counting the frontiers of PQ-trees, which are typically used for testing the COP on sets, thus showing that a polynomial algorithm is unlikely to exist when dealing with multisets. We use a combinatorial approach based on parsimonious reductions from the Hamiltonian path problem, showing that the decisional version of our problems is therefore NP-complete.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.