Paper detail

Connectivity Oracles for Planar Graphs

We consider dynamic subgraph connectivity problems for planar graphs. In this model there is a fixed underlying planar graph, where each edge and vertex is either "off" (failed) or "on" (recovered). We wish to answer connectivity queries with respect to the "on" subgraph. The model has two natural variants, one in which there are $d$ edge/vertex failures that precede all connectivity queries, and one in which failures/recoveries and queries are intermixed. We present a $d$-failure connectivity oracle for planar graphs that processes any $d$ edge/vertex failures in $sort(d,n)$ time so that connectivity queries can be answered in $pred(d,n)$ time. (Here $sort$ and $pred$ are the time for integer sorting and integer predecessor search over a subset of $[n]$ of size $d$.) Our algorithm has two discrete parts. The first is an algorithm tailored to triconnected planar graphs. It makes use of Barnette's theorem, which states that every triconnected planar graph contains a degree-3 spanning tree. The second part is a generic reduction from general (planar) graphs to triconnected (planar) graphs. Our algorithm is, moreover, provably optimal. An implication of Patrascu and Thorup's lower bound on predecessor search is that no $d$-failure connectivity oracle (even on trees) can beat $pred(d,n)$ query time. We extend our algorithms to the subgraph connectivity model where edge/vertex failures (but no recoveries) are intermixed with connectivity queries. In triconnected planar graphs each failure and query is handled in $O(\log n)$ time (amortized), whereas in general planar graphs both bounds become $O(\log^2 n)$.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.