Paper detail

Connectivity of joins, cohomological quantifier elimination, and an algebraic Toda's theorem

Let $X \subset \mathbb{P}^{n}$ be a non-empty closed subscheme over an algebraically closed field $k$, and $\mathrm{J}^{[p]}(X) = \mathrm{J}(X,\mathrm{J}(X,\cdots,\mathrm{J}(X,X)\cdots)$ denote the $p$-fold iterated join of $X$ with itself. In this article, we prove that the restriction homomorphism on cohomology $\mathrm{H}^{i}(\mathbb{P}^{N}) \rightarrow \mathrm{H}^{i}(\mathrm{J}^{[p]}(X))$, with $N = (p+1)(n+1)-1$, is an isomorphism for $0 \leq i < p$, and injective for $i=p$, for any good cohomology theory. We also prove this result in the more general setting of relative joins for $X$ over a base scheme $S$, where $S$ is of finite type over $k$. We give several applications of these results including a cohomological version of classical quantifier elimination in the first order theory of algebraically closed fields of arbitrary characteristic, as well as an algebraic version of Toda's theorem in complexity theory valid over algebraically closed fields of arbitrary characteristic. We also apply our results to obtain effective bounds on the Betti numbers of image of projective varieties under projection map.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.