Paper detail

Connectivity for bridge-alterable graph classes

A collection of graphs is called bridge-alterable if, for each graph G with a bridge e, G is in the class if and only if G-e is. For example the class of forests is bridge-alterable. For a random forest $F_n$ sampled uniformly from the set of forests on vertex set {1,..,n}, a classical result of Renyi (1959) shows that the probability that $F_n$ is connected is $e^{-1/2 +o(1)}$. Recently Addario-Berry, McDiarmid and Reed (2012) and Kang and Panagiotou (2013) independently proved that, given a bridge-alterable class, for a random graph $R_n$ sampled uniformly from the graphs in the class on {1,..,n}, the probability that $R_n$ is connected is at least $e^{-1/2 +o(1)}$. Here we give a more straightforward proof, and obtain a stronger non-asymptotic form of this result, which compares the probability to that for a random forest. We see that the probability that $R_n$ is connected is at least the minimum over $\frac25 n < t \leq n$ of the probability that $F_t$ is connected.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.