Paper detail

Connectivity and giant component in random distance graphs

Various different random graph models have been proposed in which the vertices of the graph are seen as members of a metric space, and edges between vertices are determined as a function of the distance between the corresponding metric space elements. We here propose a model $G=G(X, f)$, in which $(X, d)$ is a metric space, $V(G)=X$, and $\mathbb{P}(u\sim v) = f(d(u, v))$, where $f$ is a decreasing function on the set of possible distances in $X$. We consider the case that $X$ is the $n\times n \times \dots\times n$ integer lattice in dimension $r$, with $d$ the $\ell_1$ metric, and $f(d) = \frac{1}{n^βd}$, and determine a threshold for the emergence of the giant component and connectivity in this model. We compare this model with a traditional Waxman graph. Further, we discuss expected degrees of nodes in detail for dimension 2.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.