Paper detail

Connection between in-plane upper critical field $H_{c2}$ and gap symmetry in layered $d$-wave superconductors revisited

Angle-resolved upper critical field $H_{c2}$ provides an efficient tool to probe the gap symmetry of unconventional superconductors. We revisit the behavior of in-plane $H_{c2}$ in $d$-wave superconductors by considering both the orbital effect and Pauli paramagnetic effect. After carrying out systematic analysis, we show that the maxima of $H_{c2}$ could be along either nodal or antinodal directions of a $d$-wave superconducting gap, depending on the specific values of a number of tuning parameters. This behavior is in contrast to the common belief that the maxima of in-plane $H_{c2}$ are along the direction where the superconducting gap takes its maximal value. Therefore, identifying the precise $d$-wave gap symmetry through fitting experiments results of angle-resolved $H_{c2}$ with model calculations at a fixed temperature, as widely used in previous studies, is difficult and practically unreliable. However, our extensive analysis of angle-resolved $H_{c2}$ show that there is a critical temperature $T^{*}$: in-plane $H_{c2}$ exhibits its maxima along nodal directions at $T < T^{*}$ and along antinodal directions at $T^{*} < T < T_c$. The concrete value of $T^{*}$ may change as other parameters vary, but the existence of $π/4$ shift of $H_{c2}$ at $T^{\ast}$ appears to be a general feature. Thus a better method to identify the precise $d$-wave gap symmetry is to measure $H_{c2}$ at a number of different temperatures, and examine whether there is a $π/4$ shift in its angular dependence at certain $T^{*}$. We further show that Landau level mixing does not change this general feature. However, in the presence of Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov state, the angular dependence of $H_{c2}$ becomes quite complicated, which makes it more difficult to determine the gap symmetry by measuring $H_{c2}$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.