Paper detail

Connecting Primordial Star Forming Regions and Second Generation Star Formation in the Phoenix Simulations

We introduce the {\em Phoenix Simulations}, a suite of highly resolved cosmological simulations featuring hydrodynamics, primordial gas chemistry, Population III and II star formation and feedback, UV radiative transfer, and saved outputs with $Δt$=200 kyr. The suite samples 73,523 distinct primordial star formation events within \npiii distinct regions, forming \ngii second-generation enriched star clusters by $z \geq 12$ within a cumulative 156.25 Mpc$^3$ volume. The regions that lead to enriched star formation contain up to $167$ primordial stars, with 78.7 \% of regions having experienced multiple types of primordial supernovae. The extent of a primordial region, measured by its metal-rich surrounding cloud, is highly variable: the average region has radius $\sim 3$ kpc, with 95 \% confidence limit on the distribution of measured radii is $\sim 5-7$ kpc. For continuing star formation, we find that the metallicity distribution of second generation stars is similar to that of subsequent Population II star formation, with both distributions spanning hyper metal-deficient ([Z/H]$\sim-7$) to super-solar ([Z/H]$\sim0.8$). We find that the metallicity of second generation stars has no strong dependence on the configuration of progenitor supernovae, with the mean metallicity of second-generation stars having $-1.73 < $[Z/H]$<-2.15$. Finally, we create an interpretable regression model to predict the radius of metal-rich influence of \piii star systems within the first 7-18 Myr after the first light. The model predicts the radius with $R_2 \gtrsim 0.4$ and mean squared error $\leq 0.06$. The probability distribution function of predicted radii compares well to that of observed radii with Jensen-Shannon distance $\lesssim 0.2$ for all modelled times.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.