Paper detail

Conic stability of polynomials and positive maps

Given a proper cone $K \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$, a multivariate polynomial $f \in \mathbb{C}[z] = \mathbb{C}[z_1, \ldots, z_n]$ is called $K$-stable if it does not have a root whose vector of the imaginary parts is contained in the interior of $K$. If $K$ is the non-negative orthant, then $K$-stability specializes to the usual notion of stability of polynomials. We study conditions and certificates for the $K$-stability of a given polynomial $f$, especially for the case of determinantal polynomials as well as for quadratic polynomials. A particular focus is on psd-stability. For cones $K$ with a spectrahedral representation, we construct a semidefinite feasibility problem, which, in the case of feasibility, certifies $K$-stability of $f$. This reduction to a semidefinite problem builds upon techniques from the connection of containment of spectrahedra and positive maps. In the case of psd-stability, if the criterion is satisfied, we can explicitly construct a determinantal representation of the given polynomial. We also show that under certain conditions, for a $K$-stable polynomial $f$, the criterion is at least fulfilled for some scaled version of $K$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.