Paper detail

Confronting Galactic and Extragalactic $γ$-ray observed by Fermi-LAT with Annihilating Dark Matter in Inert Higgs Doublet Model

In this thorough study we focus on the indirect detection of Dark Matter (DM) through the confrontation of unexplained galactic and extragalactic $γ$-ray signatures for a low mass DM model. For this, we consider a simple Higgs-portal DM model, namely, the inert Higgs doublet model (IHDM) where the Standard Model is extended with an additional complex SU(2)$_L$ doublet scalar. The stability of the DM candidate in this model, i.e., the lightest neutral scalar component of the extra doublet, is ensured by imposing discrete $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry. The reduced-$χ^2$ analysis with the theoretical, experimental and observational constraints suggests the best-fit value of DM mass in this model to be $\sim$ 63.5 GeV. We analyse the anomalous GeV $γ$-ray excess from Galactic Centre in light of the best-fit IHDM parameters. We further check the consistency of the best-fit IHDM parameters with the Fermi-LAT obtained limits on photon flux for 18 Milky Way dwarf spheroidal satellite galaxies (dSphs) known to be mostly dominated by DM. Also since the $γ$-ray signal from DM annihilation is assumed to be embedded within the extragalactic $γ$-ray background (EGB), the theoretical calculations of photon flux for the best-fit parameter point in the IHDM framework are compared with the Fermi-LAT results for diffuse and isotropic EGB for different extragalactic and astrophysical background parametrisations. We show that the low mass DM in IHDM framework can satisfactorily confront all the observed continuum $γ$-ray fluxes originated from galactic as well as extragalactic sources. The extensive analysis performed in this work is valid for any Higgs-portal model with DM mass in the ballpark of that considered in this work.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.