Paper detail

Conformal Dilaton-Higgs Gravity on Warped Spacetimes: Black Hole Paradoxes revisited

We investigate on a Randall-Sundrum warped spacetime, a Kerr-like black hole in the conformal dilaton-Higgs $(ω,Φ)$ gravity model. We applied the antipodal boundary condition on the Klein surface using the $\mathds{Z}_2$-symmetry in the "large" (bulk) extra dimension. It turns out that the pseudo-Riemannian 5D manifold can be written as an effective 4D Riemannian brane spacetime, $\mathds{R}^2_+\times\mathds{R}^1\times S^1$, where $\mathds{R}^2_+$ is conformally flat. The solution in valid on both manifolds. So the solution can equally well described by an instanton solution. An advantage is that antipodicity can be maintained without a "cut-and-past" method or to rely on quantum cloning, when treating the scattering description of the evaporation process of the Hawking radiation. We need only the windingnumber as quantum number. Moreover, the equations are invariant under time reversal. The problem of finding the matching condition of the near-horizon approximation and the far-away Regge-Wheeler approximation, can possibly be solved by splitting the spacetime in a dilaton field times an "un-physical" spacetime, which is conformally flat. In the case of a constant gauge field, we find that the conform invariant mass term $\sim Φ^2ω^2$ in the Lagrangian follows directly from the superfluous dilaton equation by suitable choice of the scale of the extra dimension.Finally, we bring forward the relation between the embedded Klein surface in $\mathds{R}^4$ and the quantum mechanical information paradox.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.