Paper detail

Conformal Bjorken flow in the general frame and its attractor: Similarities and discrepancies with the Müller-Israel-Stewart formalism

We investigate the implications of the general frame approach for conformal Bjorken flow beyond the earlier studies. We show that the power series solution at late times is not unique and is accompanied by an exact solution of the form $1/τ$, which becomes unphysical if taken on shell. In contrast to the Müller-Israel-Stewart formalism, a matching between $\NFSYM$ results and the hydro expansion is only possible up to the first order, which gives rise to $η/s=1/4π$. Matching the results to the next order gives rise to causality/stability-violating values. Furthermore, we show that the pressure anisotropy in the general frame cannot capture the hydrodynamization, and we introduce an alternative measure to find the attractor. Using slow-roll expansion, we find an analytical approximation form for the attractor. We also show that the early-time behavior of attractors is related to stability and causality conditions. The attractor solutions outside the stable and causal regime give rise to reheating and negative longitudinal pressures in early times, in contrast to the stable and causal ones. We also comment on the violation of the second law of thermodynamics by the off-shell parameters. We show that for the stable and causal choice of parameters, the off-shell canonical entropy of the attractors, which is not a physical quantity, has a negative divergence in early times before tending to its on-shell limit. On the other hand, the unstable and acausal attractors have non-negative entropy divergence. We speculate that the violation of the second law by stable and causal off-shell parameters is required for stability of the first-order hydrodynamics. We investigate the analytical structure of the Borel-transformed series and find the proper relation between the poles and nonhydro modes.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.