Paper detail

Confirmation of the nature of the absorber in IRAS 09104+4109

We present the first long \emph{Suzaku} observation of the hyperluminous infrared galaxy IRAS 09104+4109 which is dominated by a Type 2 AGN. The infrared to X-ray SED indicates that the source is an obscured quasar with a Compton-thin absorber. However, the 3$σ$ hard X-ray detection of the source with the \emph{BeppoSAX} PDS suggested a reflection-dominated, Compton-thick view. The high-energy detection was later found to be possibly contaminated by another Type 2 AGN, NGC 2785, which is only 17 arcmin away. Our new \emph{Suzaku} observation offers simultaneous soft and hard X-ray coverage and excludes contamination from NGC 2785. We find that the hard X-ray component is not detected by the \emph{Suzaku} HXD/PIN (effective energy band 14-45 keV). Both reflection and transmission models have been tested on the latest \emph{Suzaku} and \emph{Chandra} data. The 0.5-10 keV spectrum can be well modelled by the two scenarios. In addition, our analysis implied that the absorption column required in both models is $N_{\rm H} \sim 5 \times 10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$. Unless IRAS 09104+4109 is a "changing-look" quasar, we confirm that it is a Compton-thin AGN. Although the lack of detection of X-ray emission above 10 keV seems to favour the transmission scenario, we found that the two models offer fairly similar flux predictions over the X-ray band below $\sim$ 40 keV. We also found that the strong iron line shown in the \emph{Suzaku} spectrum is in fact a blend of two emission lines, in which the 6.4 keV one is mostly contributed from the AGN and the 6.7 keV from the hot cluster gas. This implies that the neutral line is perhaps caused by disc reflection, and the reflection-dominated model is more likely the explanation. The transmission model should not be completely ruled out, but a deeper hard X-ray spectrum observation is needed to discriminate between the two scenarios.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.