Paper detail

Confirmation of a metallicity spread amongst first population stars in globular clusters

Stars in massive star clusters exhibit intrinsic variations in some light elements (MPs) that are difficult to explain in a coherent formation scenario. In recent years, HST photometry has led to the characterisation of the global properties of th MPs in an unparalleled level of detail. In particular, the colour-colour diagrams known as chromosome maps have been proven to be very efficient at separating cluster stars with field-like metal abundance distribution (1P) from object with distinctive light-element abundance anti-correlations (2P). The unexpected wide colour ranges covered by the 1P group in the chromosome maps of the majority of the investigated Galactic GCs have been recently attributed to intrinsic metallicity variations up to ~0.30 dex, from the study of SGB stars in two metal rich Galactic GCs by employing appropriate HST filter combinations. On the other hand, high-resolution spectroscopy of small samples of 1P stars in NGC 3201 and NGC 2808 have so far provided conflicting results, with a spread of metallicity detected in NGC 3201 but not in NGC 2808. We present a new method that employs HST near-UV and optical photometry of RGB stars, to independently confirm these results. Our approach has been firstly validated using observational data for M2, a GC hosting a small group of 1P stars with enhanced (by ~0.5 dex) metallicity with respect to the main component. We have then applied our method to three clusters that cover a much larger metallicity range, and have well populated, extended first population sequences in their chromosome maps, namely M92, NGC2808, and NGC6362. We confirm that metallicity spreads are present among 1P stars in these clusters, thus solidifying the case for the existence of unexpected variations up to a factor of two of metal abundances in most GCs. We also confirm the complex behaviour of the mean metallicity differences between 1P and 2P stars.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.