Paper detail

Confirmation of 1RXS J165443.5-191620 as an intermediate polar and its orbital and spin periods

Aims: We investigate the physical nature of the X-ray emitting source 1RXS J165443.5-191620 through optical photometry and time-resolved spectroscopy. Methods: Optical photometry is obtained from a variety of telescopes all over the world spanning about 27 days. Additionally, time-resolved spectroscopy is obtained from the MDM observatory. Results: The optical photometry clearly displays modulations consistent with those observed in magnetic cataclysmic variables: a low-frequency signal interpreted as the orbital period, a high-frequency signal interpreted as the white dwarf spin period, and an orbital sideband modulation. Our findings and interpretations are further confirmed through optical, time-resolved, spectroscopy that displays H-alpha radial velocity shifts modulated on the binary orbital period. Conclusion: We confirm the true nature of 1RXS J165443.5-191620 as an intermediate polar with a spin period of 546 seconds and an orbital period of 3.7 hours. In particular, 1RXS J165443.5-191620 is part of a growing subset of intermediate polars, all displaying hard X-ray emission above 15keV, white dwarf spin periods below 30 minutes, and spin-to-orbital ratios below 0.1.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access15 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.