Paper detail

Configuration mixing in particle decay and reaction

Background: Decay constants of unstable nuclei and particles are quantum constants. Recent controversy on the existence (versus non-existence) of variability in the observation of decay rate can be settled by considering mixing in decay configuration. Purpose: Variability in decay rate was investigated based on the available information of beta decay rate data, solar neutrino flux, and energy distribution. Method: Full systematic analysis of the oscillatory behavior was carried out. Based on the zero threshold energy for neutrino absorption in beta emitters, a model for configuration mixing between two distinct beta disintegration modes $β^ν$-disintegration (electron from neutrino interaction) and the $β^-$-disintegration (electron from natural decay) was proposed. Results: The phenomenon of variability in beta decay rate was related to the possible exothermic neutrino absorption by unstable nuclei which, in principle, should include the whole range of flux energies involving flux with energy below the $^{71}$Ga threshold at 0.23 MeV. These two disintegration modes occur independently and model for their apparent mixing rate was proposed. Conclusions: The configuration mixing between the two modes causes depletion of radioactive nuclei which is subject to change with seasonal solar neutrino variability. Ability to detect this variability was found to be dependent on the Q-value of the $β^ν$ disintegration and detection instrument setup. Value of neutrino cross section weighted by the ratio between $β^ν$ and $β^-$ detection efficiencies was found to be in the range $10^{-44}$ to $10^{-36}$ cm$^{2}$. For experiments that uses the end point to determine the neutrino mass, interference due to mixing should be taken into account.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.