Paper detail

Confidence Estimation for Object Detection in Document Images

Deep neural networks are becoming increasingly powerful and large and always require more labelled data to be trained. However, since annotating data is time-consuming, it is now necessary to develop systems that show good performance while learning on a limited amount of data. These data must be correctly chosen to obtain models that are still efficient. For this, the systems must be able to determine which data should be annotated to achieve the best results. In this paper, we propose four estimators to estimate the confidence of object detection predictions. The first two are based on Monte Carlo dropout, the third one on descriptive statistics and the last one on the detector posterior probabilities. In the active learning framework, the three first estimators show a significant improvement in performance for the detection of document physical pages and text lines compared to a random selection of images. We also show that the proposed estimator based on descriptive statistics can replace MC dropout, reducing the computational cost without compromising the performances.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.