Paper detail

Conferencing in Wyner's Asymmetric Interference Network: Effect of Number of Rounds

Our goal is to study the effect of the number of conferencing rounds on the capacity of large interference networks. We do this at hand of the per-user multiplexing gain (MG) of Wyner's soft-handoff model with dedicated conferencing links between neighbouring transmitters and receivers. We present upper and lower bounds on the per-user MG of this network, which depend on the capacities of the transmitter- and receiver-conferencing links and on the number of allowed conferencing rounds. The bounds are tight when: the prelogs of the conferencing links are small or high; there is only transmitter conferencing or only receiver conferencing; or some symmetry conditions between transmitter-conferencing and receiver-conferencing hold. We also determine the per-user MG of the network when the number of conferencing rounds is unlimited. Our results show that for small conferencing prelogs around 1/6, a single conferencing round suffices to attain the maximum per-user MG when the number of conferencing rounds is unconstrained. In contrast, when the prelogs are large, then every additional conferencing round increases the maximum per-user MG.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.