Paper detail

Conducting Atomic Force Microscopy Studies of Nanoscale Cobalt Silicide Schottky Barriers on Si(111) and Si(100)

Cobalt silicide (CoSi2) islands have been formed by the deposition of thin films (~0.1 to 0.3 nm) of cobalt on clean Si(111) and Si(100) substrates in ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) followed by annealing to ~880 degrees C. Conducting atomic force microscopy has been performed on these islands to characterize and measure their current-voltage (I-V) characteristics. Current-voltage curves were analyzed using thermionic emission theory to obtain the Schottky barrier heights and ideality factors between the silicide islands and the silicon substrates. Current-voltage measurements were performed ex situ for samples ("passivated surfaces") where the silicon surface surrounding the islands was passivated with a native oxide. Other samples ("clean surfaces") remained in UHV while I-V curves were recorded. By comparing barrier heights and ideality factors for islands on both surfaces, the effects of the non-passivated surfaces on conduction were studied. The clean surface barrier heights were found to be ~0.2 to 0.3 eV below barrier heights measured from similar islands on passivated surfaces. The reduced Schottky barrier is mainly attributed to Fermi level pinning by non-passivated surface states of the clean silicon surface. However, the measured barrier heights of the clean surface islands are equivalent on both Si(111) and Si(100), suggesting that the non-passivated surfaces are influenced by cobalt impurities. Furthermore, the barrier heights of islands on the clean surfaces are lower than due to Fermi level pinning alone and the additional barrier height lowering is primarily attributed to spreading resistance effects. Schottky barrier inhomogeneity may also cause additional barrier height lowering and non-ideality in the contacts. The clean surface barrier heights decreased and the ideality factors increased with decreasing temperature, which is attributed to the temperature variation of the Fermi level.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.