Paper detail

Conductance of 1D quantum wires with anomalous electron-wavefunction localization

We study the statistics of the conductance $g$ through one-dimensional disordered systems where electron wavefunctions decay spatially as $|ψ| \sim \exp (-λr^α)$ for $0 <α<1$, $λ$ being a constant. In contrast to the conventional Anderson localization where $|ψ| \sim \exp (-λr)$ and the conductance statistics is determined by a single parameter: the mean free path, here we show that when the wave function is anomalously localized ($α<1$) the full statistics of the conductance is determined by the average $<\ln g>$ and the power $α$. Our theoretical predictions are verified numerically by using a random hopping tight-binding model at zero energy, where due to the presence of chiral symmetry in the lattice there exists anomalous localization; this case corresponds to the particular value $α=1/2$. To test our theory for other values of $α$, we introduce a statistical model for the random hopping in the tight binding Hamiltonian.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.