Paper detail

Conditional Multilevel Monte Carlo Simulation of Groundwater Flow in the Culebra Dolomite at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Site

We extended the multilevel Monte of Carlo (MLMC) approach to simulation of groundwater flow in porous media by incorporating direct measurements of medium properties. Numerical simulations of Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) repository in southeastern New Mexico are performed to test the performance of the conditional MLMC technique. The log-transmissivity of WIPP site is modeled as the conditional random fields which honor exact field values at a few locations. The conditional random fields are generated through the modified circulant embedding methods in (Dietrich and Newsam, 1996). We also study effects of a combination of the conditional MLMC accompanied by antithetic variates. The main quantity of interest is the time of radionuclides travelling from the center of repository to the site boundary. Numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of the multilevel approach in comparison to the standard Monte Carlo (MC) simulation.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.