Paper detail

Condensed Generalized Finite Element Method (CGFEM)

Generalized or extended finite element methods (GFEM/XFEM) are in general badly conditioned and have numerous additional degrees of freedom (DOF) compared with the FEM because of introduction of enriched functions. In this paper, we develop an approach to establish a subspace of a conventional GFEM/XFEM approximation space using partition of unity (PU) techniques and local least square procedures. The proposed GFEM is referred to as condensed GFEM (CGFEM), which (i) possesses as many DOFs as the preliminary FEM, (ii) enjoys similar approximation properties with the GFEM/XFEM, and (iii) is well-conditioned in a sense that its conditioning is of the same order as that of the FEM. The fundamental approximation properties of CGFEM is proven mathematically. The CGFEM is applied to a problem of high order polynomial approximations and a Poisson crack problem; optimal convergence orders of the former are proven rigorously. The numerical experiments and comparisons with the conventional GFEM/XFEM and FEM are made to verify the theory and effectiveness of CGFEM.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.