Paper detail

Condensation and Metastable Behavior of Non-reversible Inclusion Processes

In this article, we perform quantitative analyses of metastable behavior of an interacting particle system known as the inclusion process. For inclusion processes, it is widely believed that the system nucleates the condensation of particles because of the attractive nature of the interaction mechanism. The metastable behavior of the inclusion processes corresponds to the movement of the condensate on a suitable time scale, and the computation of the corresponding time scale and the characterization of the scaling limit of the condensate motion are the main problems in the study of metastability of inclusion processes. Previously, these problems were solved for reversible inclusion processes in [Bianchi, Dommers, and Giardinà, Electronic Journal of Probability, 22: 1-34, 2017], and the main contribution of the present study is to extend this analysis to a wide class of non-reversible inclusion processes. Non-reversibility is a major obstacle to analyzing such models, mainly because there is no closed-form expression of the invariant measure for the general case, and our main achievement is to overcome this difficulty. In particular, our results demonstrate that the time scale and limiting process of non-reversible inclusion processes are quantitatively and qualitatively different from those of reversible ones, respectively. We emphasize that, to the best of our knowledge, these results are the first rigorous quantitative results in the study of metastability when the invariant measure is not explicitly known. In addition, we consider the thermodynamic limit of metastable behavior of inclusion processes on large torus as in the paper [Armendáriz, Grosskinsky, and Loulakis, Probability Theory and Related Fields, 169: 105-175, 2017]. For this model, we observe three different time scales according to the level of asymmetry of the model.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.