Concordances to prime hyperbolic virtual knots

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

Let Σ0,Σ1Σ_0,Σ_1 be closed oriented surfaces. Two oriented knots K0⊂Σ0×[0,1]K_0 \subset Σ_0 \times [0,1] and K1⊂Σ1×[0,1]K_1 \subset Σ_1 \times [0,1] are said to be (virtually) concordant if there is a compact oriented 33-manifold WW and a smoothly and properly embedded annulus AA in W×[0,1]W \times [0,1] such that ∂W=Σ1⊔−Σ0\partial W=Σ_1 \sqcup -Σ_0 and ∂A=K1⊔−K0\partial A=K_1 \sqcup -K_0. This notion of concordance, due to Turaev, is equivalent to concordance of virtual knots, due to Kauffman. A prime virtual knot, in the sense of Matveev, is one for which no thickened surface representative K⊂Σ×[0,1]K \subset Σ\times [0,1] admits a nontrivial decomposition along a separating vertical annulus that intersects KK in two points. Here we prove that every knot K⊂Σ×[0,1]K \subset Σ\times [0,1] is concordant to a prime satellite knot and a prime hyperbolic knot. For homologically trivial knots in Σ×[0,1]Σ\times [0,1], we prove this can be done so that the Alexander polynomial is preserved. This generalizes the corresponding results for classical knot concordance, due to Bleiler, Kirby-Lickorish, Livingston, Myers, Nakanishi, and Soma. The new challenge for virtual knots lies in proving primeness. Contrary to the classical case, not every hyperbolic knot in Σ×[0,1]Σ\times [0,1] is prime and not every composite knot is a satellite. Our results are obtained using a generalization of tangles in 33-balls we call complementary tangles. Properties of complementary tangles are studied in detail.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.