Paper detail

Concordance models of reionization: implications for faint galaxies and escape fraction evolution

Recent observations have constrained the galaxy UV luminosity function up to z~10. However, these observations alone allow for a wide range of reionization scenarios due to uncertainties in the abundance of faint galaxies and the escape fraction of ionizing photons. We show that requiring continuity with post-reionization (z<6) measurements, where the Lya forest provides a complete probe of the cosmological emissivity of ionizing photons, significantly reduces the permitted parameter space. Models that are simultaneously consistent with the measured UV luminosity function, the Thomson optical depth to the CMB, and the Lya forest data require either: 1) extrapolation of the galaxy luminosity function down to very faint UV magnitudes M_lim ~ -10, corresponding roughly to the UV background suppression scale; 2) an increase of f_esc by a factor > ~10 from z=4 (where the best fit is 4%) to z=9; or 3) more likely, a hybrid solution in which undetected galaxies contribute significantly and f_esc increases more modestly. Models in which star formation is strongly suppressed in low-mass, reionization-epoch haloes of mass up to ~10^10 M_sun (e.g., owing to a metallicity dependence) are only allowed for extreme assumptions for the evolution of f_esc. However, variants of such models in which the suppression mass is reduced (e.g., assuming an earlier or higher metallicity floor) are in better agreement with the data. Concordance scenarios satisfying the available data predict a consistent redshift of 50% ionized fraction z_reion(50%) ~ 10. On the other hand, the duration of reionization is sensitive to the relative contribution of bright versus faint galaxies, with scenarios dominated by faint galaxies predicting a more extended reionization event. Scenarios relying too heavily on high-z dwarfs are disfavored by kinetic Sunyaev-Zeldovich measurements, which prefer a short reionization history.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.