Paper detail

Concordance and the Smallest Covering Set of Preference Orderings

Preference orderings are orderings of a set of items according to the preferences (of judges). Such orderings arise in a variety of domains, including group decision making, consumer marketing, voting and machine learning. Measuring the mutual information and extracting the common patterns in a set of preference orderings are key to these areas. In this paper we deal with the representation of sets of preference orderings, the quantification of the degree to which judges agree on their ordering of the items (i.e. the concordance), and the efficient, meaningful description of such sets. We propose to represent the orderings in a subsequence-based feature space and present a new algorithm to calculate the size of the set of all common subsequences - the basis of a quantification of concordance, not only for pairs of orderings but also for sets of orderings. The new algorithm is fast and storage efficient with a time complexity of only $O(Nn^2)$ for the orderings of $n$ items by $N$ judges and a space complexity of only $O(\min\{Nn,n^2\})$. Also, we propose to represent the set of all $N$ orderings through a smallest set of covering preferences and present an algorithm to construct this smallest covering set. The source code for the algorithms is available at https://github.com/zhiweiuu/secs

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.