Paper detail

Concerns about the replica wormhole derivation of the island conjecture

In a close look at the replica wormhole derivation of the island conjecture, we note a discrepancy in the derived matrix eigenvalues in the limit where the Hawking radiation entropy goes to zero. The small corrections to the density matrix for the radiation infer that ${\rm tr}(ρ_\textsf{R}^2)$, equally a sum over the eigenvalues squared, must be small ($\ll1$) at all times. This is in contradiction with an ensemble dominated by a density matrix with an eigenvalue close to unity. Also, the radiation entropy has been approximated by the ensemble averaged entropy, as in a final state analysis. For $ρ_\textsf{R}=ρ_\textsf{R}(σ)$ with $σ$ the set of variables used in the average, the ensemble average is only an accurate estimate of the entropy after $σ$ has been measured. At the formation of each Hawking pair, there is a distribution over $σ$ that affects the entropy. Without a real time determination of $σ$, the radiation entropy follows Hawking's result during the evaporation. A question remains of how quickly such determinations can be assumed to occur. A complete argument for that the radiation entropy follows the Page curve should address this.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.