Paper detail

Concerns about Modelling of the EDGES Data

It is predicted that the spectrum of radio emission from the whole sky should show a dip arising from the action of the light from the first stars on the hydrogen atoms in the surrounding gas, which causes the 21-cm line to appear in absorption against the cosmic microwave background. Bowman et al. 2018 identified a broad flat-bottomed absorption profile centred at 78 MHz, which could be this feature, although the depth of the profile is much larger than expected. We have examined the modelling process they used and find that their data implies unphysical parameters for the foreground emission and also that their solution is not unique in the sense that we found other simple formulations for the signal that are different in shape but that also fit their data. We argue that this calls into question the interpretation of these data as an unambiguous detection of the cosmological 21-cm absorption signature.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.