Paper detail

Conceptual Design Report of DaRveX: Decay at Rest $ν_e$ + Lead Cross Section Measurement at J-PARC MLF

DaRveX stands for "Decay at Rest $ν_e$-Pb cross (X) section measurement". So far, there has not been good target to detect low energy $ν_e$. Lead is expected to be an excellent $ν_e$ target because the cross section is expected to be very large and the delayed coincidence technique can be used using final state neutron(s). However, the cross section have not been measured yet. If it is measured, it opens a new window to the future neutrino research field, such as low energy $ν_e$ oscillation measurements, flavor specific detection of the supernova explosion $ν_e$ and understanding of $ν_e$-nucleus interactions. This report explains a conceptual design of DaRveX experiment, which measures cross section of $ν_e$+Pb charged current interaction, $ν_e$(E~30MeV)+Pb $\to$ $e^-$+$xn$+Bi; ($x$=1 or 2), using $ν_e$ from $μ^+$ decay at rest at J-PARC MLF. The energy and direction of the final state $e^-$ will be measured by using 1-ton scale lead-scintillator sandwich detector. With two years of data taking, the cross section is expected to be measured with 20% of precision.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access11 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.