Paper detail

Concept Study of a Compact, High Gradient X-band Travelling Wave RF Photogun with Novel Laser Coupling Scheme

This paper presents the design of a travelling wave RF photogun operating at the European X-band frequency of 11.994 GHz. The design is based on a CLIC prototype structure milled from copper halves and uses the unique gap introduced in the geometry to couple in the laser without obstructing the outgoing electron beam. With a modest peak input power of 19 MW and a fill time of 48 ns, the gun has the ability to operate at very high RF pulse repetition rates in comparison to standing wave RF photoguns. For its nominal input power, the cathode has a peak gradient of 91 MV/m and the entire gun has a gradient of 65 MV/m. The gun is illustrated to provide an 80 pC bunch at a 14.15 MeV with a 0.14 $\%$ RMS energy spread and an emittance of 0.6 mm mrad at a repetition rate of at least 450 Hz.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.