Paper detail

Concentration of the Kirchhoff index for Erdos-Renyi graphs

Given an undirected graph, the resistance distance between two nodes is the resistance one would measure between these two nodes in an electrical network if edges were resistors. Summing these distances over all pairs of nodes yields the so-called Kirchhoff index of the graph, which measures its overall connectivity. In this work, we consider Erdos-Renyi random graphs. Since the graphs are random, their Kirchhoff indices are random variables. We give formulas for the expected value of the Kirchhoff index and show it concentrates around its expectation. We achieve this by studying the trace of the pseudoinverse of the Laplacian of Erdos-Renyi graphs. For synchronization (a class of estimation problems on graphs) our results imply that acquiring pairwise measurements uniformly at random is a good strategy, even if only a vanishing proportion of the measurements can be acquired.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.