Paper detail

Concave cocirculations in a triangular grid

Let $G=(V(G),E(G))$ be a planar digraph embedded in the plane in which all inner faces are equilateral triangles (with three edges in each), and let the union $\Rscr$ of these faces forms a convex polygon. The question is: given a function $σ$ on the boundary edges of $G$, does there exist a concave function $f$ on $\Rscr$ which is affinely linear within each bounded face and satisfies $f(v)-f(u)=σ(e)$ for each boundary edge $e=(u,v)$? The functions $σ$ admitting such an $f$ form a polyhedral cone $C$, and when the region $\Rscr$ is a triangle, $C$ turns out to be exactly the cone of boundary data of honeycombs. Studing honeycombs in connection with a problem on spectra of triples of zero-sum Hermitian matrices, Knutson, Tao, and Woodward \cite{KTW} showed that $C$ is described by linear inequalities of Horn's type with respect to so-called {\em puzzles}, along with obvious linear constraints. The purpose of this paper is to give an alternative proof of that result, working in terms of discrete concave finctions, rather than honeycombs, and using only linear programming and combinatorial tools. Moreover, we extend the result to an arbitrary convex polygon $\Rscr$.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.