Paper detail

Concatenated Raptor Codes in NAND Flash Memory

Two concatenated coding schemes based on fixed-rate Raptor codes are proposed for error control in NAND flash memory. One is geared for off-line recovery of uncorrectable pages and the other is designed for page error correction during the normal read mode. Both proposed coding strategies assume hard-decision decoding of the inner code with inner decoding failure generating erasure symbols for the outer Raptor code. Raptor codes allow low-complexity decoding of very long codewords while providing capacity- approaching performance for erasure channels. For the off-line page recovery scheme, one whole NAND block forms a Raptor codeword with each inner codeword typically made up of several Raptor symbols. An efficient look-up-table strategy is devised for Raptor encoding and decoding which avoids using large buffers in the controller despite the substantial size of the Raptor code employed. The potential performance benefit of the proposed scheme is evaluated in terms of the probability of block recovery conditioned on the presence of uncorrectable pages. In the suggested page-error-correction strategy, on the other hand, a hard-decision-iterating product code is used as the inner code. The specific product code employed in this work is based on row-column concatenation with multiple intersecting bits allowing the use of longer component codes. In this setting the collection of bits captured within each intersection of the row-column codes acts as the Raptor symbol(s), and the intersections of failed row codes and column codes are declared as erasures. The error rate analysis indicates that the proposed concatenation provides a considerable performance boost relative to the existing error correcting system based on long Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem (BCH) codes.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.