Paper detail

Computing Weak Dominance Drawings with Minimum Number of Fips

A weak dominance drawing $Γ$ of a DAG $G=(V,E)$, is a $d$-dimensional drawing such that there is a directed path from a vertex $u$ to a vertex $v$ in $G$ if $D(u) <D(v)$ for every dimension $D$ of $Γ$. We have a \emph{falsely implied path (fip)} when $D(u) < D(v)$ for every dimension $D$ of~$Γ$, but there is no path from $u$ to $v$. Minimizing the number of fips is an important theoretical and practical problem, which is NP-hard. We show that it is an FPT~problem for parameter $k$, where $k$ is the maximum degree of a vertex of the \emph{modular~decomposition~tree} of~$G$. Namely, for any constant $d$, we present an $O(nm+ndk^2(k!)^d)$ time algorithm to compute a weak $d$-dimensional dominance drawing $Γ$ of a DAG $G$ having the minimum number of fips. An interesting implication of this result is that we can decide if a DAG has dominance dimension~$3$ (a well-known NP-complete problem) in time $O(nm+nk^2(k!)^3)$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.