Paper detail

Computing Similarity Queries for Correlated Gaussian Sources

Among many current data processing systems, the objectives are often not the reproduction of data, but to compute some answers based on the data resulting from queries. The similarity identification task is to identify the items in a database that are similar to a given query item for a given metric. The problem of compression for similarity identification has been studied in arXiv:1307.6609 [cs.IT]. Unlike classical compression problems, the focus is not on reconstructing the original data. Instead, the compression rate is determined by the desired reliability of the answers. Specifically, the information measure identification rate characterizes the minimum rate that can be achieved among all schemes which guarantee reliable answers with respect to a given similarity threshold. In this paper, we propose a component-based model for computing correlated similarity queries. The correlated signals are first decorrelated by the KLT transform. Then, the decorrelated signal is processed by a distinct D-admissible system for each component. We show that the component-based model equipped with KLT can perfectly represent the multivariate Gaussian similarity queries when optimal rate-similarity allocation applies. Hence, we can derive the identification rate of the multivariate Gaussian signals based on the component-based model. We then extend the result to general Gaussian sources with memory. We also study the models equipped with practical compone\nt systems. We use TC-$\triangle$ schemes that use type covering signatures and triangle-inequality decision rules as our component systems. We propose an iterative method to numerically approximate the minimum achievable rate of the TC-$\triangle$ scheme. We show that our component-based model equipped with TC-$\triangle$ schemes can achieve better performance than the TC-$\triangle$ scheme unaided on handling the multivariate Gaussian sources.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.