Paper detail

Computing list homomorphisms in geometric intersection graphs

A homomorphism from a graph $G$ to a graph $H$ is an edge-preserving mapping from $V(G)$ to $V(H)$. Let $H$ be a fixed graph with possible loops. In the list homomorphism problem, denoted by \textsc{LHom}($H$), the instance is a graph $G$, whose every vertex is equipped with a subset of $V(H)$, called list. We ask whether there exists a homomorphism from $G$ to $H$, such that every vertex from $G$ is mapped to a vertex from its list. We study the complexity of the \textsc{LHom}($H$) problem in intersection graphs of various geometric objects. In particular, we are interested in answering the question for what graphs $H$ and for what types of geometric objects, the \textsc{LHom}($H$) problem can be solved in time subexponential in the number of vertices of the instance. We fully resolve this question for string graphs, i.e., intersection graphs of continuous curves in the plane. Quite surprisingly, it turns out that the dichotomy exactly coincides with the analogous dichotomy for graphs excluding a fixed path as an induced subgraph [Okrasa, Rzążewski, STACS 2021]. Then we turn our attention to subclasses of string graphs, defined as intersections of fat objects. We observe that the (non)existence of subexponential-time algorithms in such classes is closely related to the size $\mathrm{mrc}(H)$ of a maximum reflexive clique in $H$, i.e., maximum number of pairwise adjacent vertices, each of which has a loop. We study the maximum value of $\mathrm{mrc}(H)$ that guarantees the existence of a subexponential-time algorithm for \textsc{LHom}($H$) in intersection graphs of (i) convex fat objects, (ii) fat similarly-sized objects, and (iii) disks. In the first two cases we obtain optimal results, by giving matching algorithms and lower bounds. Finally, we discuss possible extensions of our results to weighted generalizations of \textsc{LHom}($H$).

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.