Paper detail

Computing Grain Boundary 'Phase' Diagrams

Grain boundaries (GBs) can be treated as two-dimensional (2-D) interfacial phases (also called 'complexions') that can undergo interfacial phase-like transitions. As bulk phase diagrams and calculation of phase diagram (CALPHAD) methods are a foundation for modern materials science, we propose to extend them to GBs to have equally significant impacts. This perspective article reviews a series of studies to compute the GB counterparts to bulk phase diagrams. First, a phenomenological interfacial thermodynamic model was developed to construct GB lambda diagrams to forecast high-temperature GB disordering and related trends in sintering and other properties for both metallic and ceramic materials. In parallel, an Ising-type lattice statistical thermodynamic model was utilized to construct GB adsorption diagrams, which predicted first-order GB adsorption (a.k.a. segregation) transitions and critical phenomena. These two simplified thermodynamic models emphasize on the GB structural (disordering) and chemical (adsorption) aspects, respectively. Subsequently, hybrid Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics atomistic simulations were used to compute more rigorous and accurate GB 'phase' diagrams. Computed GB diagrams of thermodynamic and structural properties were further extended to include mechanical properties. Moreover, machine learning was combined with atomistic simulations to predict GB properties as functions of four independent compositional variables and temperature in a 5-D space for a given GB in high-entropy alloys or as functions of five GB macroscopic (crystallographic) degrees of freedom (DOFs) plus temperature and composition for a binary alloy in a 7-D space. Relevant other studies are examined. Future perspective and outlook, including two emerging fields of high-entropy grain boundaries (HEGBs) and electrically (or electrochemically) induced GB transitions, are discussed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.