Paper detail

Computing Bi-Lipschitz Outlier Embeddings into the Line

The problem of computing a bi-Lipschitz embedding of a graphical metric into the line with minimum distortion has received a lot of attention. The best-known approximation algorithm computes an embedding with distortion $O(c^2)$, where $c$ denotes the optimal distortion [Bădoiu \etal~2005]. We present a bi-criteria approximation algorithm that extends the above results to the setting of \emph{outliers}. Specifically, we say that a metric space $(X,ρ)$ admits a $(k,c)$-embedding if there exists $K\subset X$, with $|K|=k$, such that $(X\setminus K, ρ)$ admits an embedding into the line with distortion at most $c$. Given $k\geq 0$, and a metric space that admits a $(k,c)$-embedding, for some $c\geq 1$, our algorithm computes a $({\mathsf p}{\mathsf o}{\mathsf l}{\mathsf y}(k, c, \log n), {\mathsf p}{\mathsf o}{\mathsf l}{\mathsf y}(c))$-embedding in polynomial time. This is the first algorithmic result for outlier bi-Lipschitz embeddings. Prior to our work, comparable outlier embeddings where known only for the case of additive distortion.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.