Paper detail

Computational Modeling of Channelrhodopsin-2 Photocurrent Characteristics in Relation to Neural Signaling

Channelrhodopsins-2 (ChR2) are a class of light sensitive proteins that offer the ability to use light stimulation to regulate neural activity with millisecond precision. In order to address the limitations in the efficacy of the wild-type ChR2 (ChRwt) to achieve this objective, new variants of ChR2 that exhibit fast mono-exponential photocurrent decay characteristics have been recently developed and validated. In this paper, we investigate whether the framework of transition rate model with 4 states, primarily developed to mimic the bi-exponential photocurrent decay kinetics of ChRwt, as opposed to the low complexity 3 state model, is warranted to mimic the mono-exponential photocurrent decay kinetics of the newly developed fast ChR2 variants: ChETA (Gunaydin et al., Nature Neurosci, 13:387-392, 2010) and ChRET/TC (Berndt et al., PNAS, 108:7595-7600, 2011). We begin by estimating the parameters for the 3-state and 4-state models from experimental data on the photocurrent kinetics of ChRwt, ChETA and ChRET/TC. We then incorporate these models into a fast-spiking interneuron model (Wang and Buzsaki., J Neurosci, 16:6402-6413,1996) and a hippocampal pyramidal cell model (Golomb et al., J Neurophysiol, 96:1912-1926, 2006) and investigate the extent to which the experimentally observed neural response to various optostimulation protocols can be captured by these models. We demonstrate that for all ChR2 variants investigated, the 4 state model implementation is better able to capture neural response consistent with experiments across wide range of optostimulation protocol. We conclude by analytically investigating the conditions under which the characteristic specific to the 3-state model, namely the mono-exponential photocurrent decay of the newly developed variants of ChR2, can occurs in the framework of the 4-state model.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.