Paper detail

Computational model for tumor response to adoptive cell transfer therapy

One of the barriers to the development of effective adoptive cell transfer therapies (ACT), specifically for genetically engineered T-cell receptors (TCRs), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells, is target antigen heterogeneity. It is thought that intratumor heterogeneity is one of the leading determinants of therapeutic resistance and treatment failure. While understanding antigen heterogeneity is important for effective therapeutics, a good therapy strategy could enhance the therapy efficiency. In this work we introduce an agent-based model to rationalize the outcomes of two types of ACT therapies over heterogeneous tumors: antigen specific ACT therapy and multi-antigen recognition ACT therapy. We found that one dose of antigen specific ACT therapy should be expected to reduce the tumor size as well as its growth rate, however it may not be enough to completely eliminate it. A second dose also reduced the tumor size as well as the tumor growth rate, but, due to the intratumor heterogeneity, it turned out to be less effective than the previous dose. Moreover, an interesting emergent phenomenon results from the simulations, namely the formation of a shield-like structure of cells with low oncoprotein expression. This shield turns out to protect cells with high oncoprotein expression. On the other hand, our studies suggest that the earlier the multi-antigen recognition ACT therapy is applied, the more efficient it turns. In fact, it could completely eliminate the tumor. Based on our results, it is clear that a proper therapeutic strategy could enhance the therapies outcomes. In that direction, our computational approach provides a framework to model treatment combinations in different scenarios and explore the characteristics of successful and unsuccessful treatments.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.